Ma House Passes “Transparency” Bill With Zero Transparency

Less than 24 hours after it was publicly released, with no public hearing and no public testimony, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed H.5469, “An Act Promoting Transparency and Public Access in State Government.” It passed by a vote of 125-28.

Advocates of the statewide public records ballot initiative currently advancing toward the November 2026 ballot expressed serious concerns about both the process used to advance the legislation and key provisions of the bill itself.

The ballot initiative would end Massachusetts’ status as one of the least transparent states in the nation by requiring both the Legislature and the Governor’s Office to comply with the same public records law that already applies to state agencies and municipal governments. Massachusetts remains the only state where the legislative, executive and judicial branches all claim exemption from public records law.

The ballot initiative covers both the Governor’s Office and the Legislature. In contrast, H.5469 moves only the Governor’s Office under the current public records law. For the legislature, it sets up an alternative process and creates a limited list of records from the Legislature to be considered public, rather than a presumption of public access unless exempted.

Below is a statement from Danielle Allen, Founder and Convening Chair of the Coalition for Healthy Democracy:

“It’s hard to have confidence in any transparency and good-government legislation that is introduced and voted on within 24 hours, with no public review, testimony or legislative hearing. The Legislature spent the last year promoting new transparency reforms focused on public participation, notice and accountability, yet this bill was unveiled and rushed to a vote before the public had any meaningful opportunity to review or comment on it.

While we are continuing to analyze the bill’s details, and do appreciate the legislature’s engagement on this important matter, the initial review raises serious concerns about both the process and the substance. The people of Massachusetts deserve transparency legislation that is developed transparently.

It is difficult to trust that House leadership is committed to openness and accountability when a proposal of this magnitude is advanced without independent input or public debate. That is why we remain committed to supporting the ballot initiative for public records reform, which would apply the public records law to both the Governor’s Office and the Legislature, just as it applies to other public bodies across Massachusetts.

The people of Massachusetts should not have to rely on politicians to decide what records they are allowed to see. The ballot initiative establishes a simple principle: government records should be public unless a specific exemption applies. That is the transparency and accountability Massachusetts voters deserve from their elected leaders.”

Below is a statement from John Griffin, Executive Director of Partners In Democracy MA Action:

“The people of Massachusetts deserve a higher level of transparency from their state government. This bill was released and voted on in less than a business day, with no public hearing or comment. The process itself lacked transparency. We would welcome a truly collaborative conversation with legislators on this crucial topic—but that is not the standard set by House leadership with this legislation. We continue to support the proposed ballot question to bring the Legislature and Governor’s Office under the state’s Public Records Law.”

Below is a statement of Scotia Hille, Executive Director of Act on Mass:

“When legislators write their own ‘transparency’ rules, behind closed doors, without public input, the result is exactly what you’d expect: a bill that protects them more than it informs us. H.5469 doesn’t bring the Legislature under the public records law – it creates a special carve-out so they never have to. Massachusetts voters have showed again and again that they care deeply about accountability from our government: they won’t be fooled by this transparency theater.”

Below is a statement from John Lippitt, Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts Leadership Team:

“Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts (PDM) is appalled that House leaders would force a vote on any significant bill with barely 24 hours for representatives to review the bill. It’s deeply ironic that the House is talking about addressing transparency concerns in such a non-transparent manner. This is disrespectful of legislators and the public. It is undemocratic and, even more troubling, is that apparently this measure will be slipped into a financial bill as an outside section.

The bill’s restrictions on the availability of judicial review and enforcement of public records issues, as well as the grant of review authority to the legislature itself, are deeply disturbing and contrary to appropriate checks and balances. Needless to say, this is all very different from the treatment of municipal and other entities subject to the public records laws.

PDM is disappointed in the House’s quick vote in support of this measure and urges the Senate to oppose it. We support full application of the state’s public records law to the legislature, as it applies to municipal governments and as is called for in the proposed November ballot question.”

Back to Newsroom